A New Trade Agreement for China, NAFTA, Mercosur and other Asian countries-WITH NEWS!!!!

 On Bloomberg tonight:

Thailand representatives arguing about their partners affirming that if Thailand has no inner economical growth, they won't get the support for development they wish for.

At the same niche, Taiwan representatives speaking how China wishes to get bound the economy available in the Philippines, Thailand, Malasya, Singapore and Vietnam.

Thailand has a very attractive economy indeed, with much revenue from Tourism. However, the Tourism is rudimentary and the locals live as they souldn't consume technology.

The first step should be for Taiwan to carve a market along Thailand and the Philippines, for them to re-sell technology to Malasya, Singapore and Vietnam, by means of digital inclusion.

This is a Trade Market for Taiwan, indeed, and not for China, because it implies minor and simplest types of gadgets that would first be used in countries in phase of digital inclusion.

I insist that China should appeal for outsourcing factories to North of Canada instead, to re-sell the Brazilian steel to Canada (steel which production is accounted to Brazil, and the negotiation is granted to China). This steel would be sold in greater amounts to suffice for NASA requests of this Commodity. China faces a problem because they are required a great amount of this Commodity (steel) outsourced to the USA, in order for China to be able to sell Brazilian Agribusiness to USA Partners. For such maneuver, they need to produce and consume the commodity themselves. But the USA don't want them to re-sell to the American Trade Partners - and this is what the Trade War was all about. China doens't have a market to sell the high amounts of steel they have to consume. But, if they outsource factories to Canada, and outsource a higher amount of steel to NAFTA, then China's Trade Partners on technology wouldn't be at full stack belonging to SAMSUNG's (China), because partially they would belong to Canada - NAFTA. Also, the retribution for the steel China consumes from Brazil of which we pay-off by using nanotechnology/alias/GIP/chip of change of character as a Trade Agreement, from SAMSUNG's source, would be consumed as means of this new Trade, by the Canadian Company Byrds, that also sells nanotechnology and uses up Chinese technology on that. Thus, Brazil would have being paying off for the duties in nanotechnology to China through Canadian Byrds.

Most of all, in this New Trade Agreement with NAFTA, Brazil, China and the other countries of Asia (such as the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore, Malasya, etc), Mexico would also participate as a member of NAFTA to benefit all of its South America and Latin America direct partners onto a most enhanced catalogue of SAMSUNG electronics, bringing more technology to South America and Latin America.

As for Brazil, once we would get a higher interest rate on the steel aliquot, we would be less and less charged from our inability to pay off for the steel consumed by China through the nanotechnology Trade Agreement that don't suffice for this equation versus steel. In this old paradigm, Brazil also loses ground on negotiation of Agribusiness and other Commodities, giving out ground to stocks to China's profit (Brazil earns only for production).

All of this New Trade Agreement should be provided by Russia, which is a China's business partner. Also, Russia is neutral to this negotiation. This New Trade Agreement should determine which percentage of Brazilian Agribusiness stocks would remain at China's behalf and which part would return to B3 (Brazil), as well as much steel NAFTA is now entitled to have from China's stocks. Also, they should analyze which type of gadgets would be brought to the less developed countries in Asia, and as much percentage of stocks should The Philippines and Thailand re-sell to minor Asia. 

By having SAMSUNG to carve new market through Mexico re-sellings of China's SAMSUNG full hi-tech catalogue - to Latin America, countries in Central America should achieve digital inclusion, and 3rd World Communities in South America would reach to more enhanced gadgets, setting a new pattern of evolution to Apple devices itself. If SAMSUNG has South America and Mercosur as main good consumers, and we are unable to access the top-notch of SAMSUNG's hi-tech, Apple itself won't have an edgy competitor to evolve their own gadgets. Even markets of Japan and USA receiving the highest technology by Apple would create an issue to be solved, due to necessary demand to keep these markets being less than the technological goods produced (so to keep up with the demand), and the result is production of hi-tech disposings/technological garbage, and frenetic impulses by chips in 3-D printers self generated projetcs. (SAMSUNG has several types of simple gadgets that could reach countries in terms of digital inclusion. Apple, on the other hand, sets their evolving technology every year. This benchmark of Apple's achievements, by moving forward along with year time could be jeopardized if SAMSUNG is limited by Mercosur's impossibility to follow through and keep up with new SAMSUNG's hi-tech demands, by choosing to purchase the yearly Apple devices over the newest SAMSUNG Gadgets. Thus, we need more competitive SAMSUNG hi-tech injected in our markets, reaching different types of gadgets, and incentive to Mercosur buyers to opt for a higher developed SAMSUNG device instead of an yearly launched Apple mobile. As I see it, we need to proliferate in our companies and Organizations, an Apple-tradition for some and the SAMSUNG-tradition for other kinds of Institutions, praising for the best type of electronic facilties each of these lineages may offer, and respecting the niche one another are inserted, setting through these a more definite cleavage site between business partners and business competitors, which helps promote more business mettings between partners, to share findings and market available, thus, conventions and presentations among competitors, which helps close deals). 

All my love,

Thaís Fernanda Ortiz de Moraes